Are you ready for a world currency? If the United Nations has anything to say about it, that is exactly what we are all going to have shoved down our throats. A new United Nations report released on Tuesday essentially declares war on the U.S. dollar and publicly calls on the nations of the world to abandon it as the global reserve currency. This new report entitled "The U.N. World Economic and Social Survey 2010" is one of the most blatant attempts yet that we have seen from a major international organization to move us in the direction of a world currency. For years it was denial after denial after denial that a global currency was being considered. Of course we knew all along by reading their policy papers that the eventual goal of the globalists was indeed to move us over to a global currency. Finally, in just the past year, the International Monetary Fund's special drawing rights (SDRs) were promoted by the G20 as "an international reserve asset" that could be used as a unit of payment for IMF loans. SDRs are currently made up of a basket of various currencies from around the world, but now there are much bigger plans for the SDRs. According to the new U.N. report, the U.S. dollar should be abandoned in favor of a new world currency based on these SDRs….

"A new global reserve system could be created, one that no longer relies on the United States dollar as the single major reserve currency."

So why abandon the U.S. dollar? Well, the U.N. report says that we must abandon it because it has not been "stable" enough….

"The dollar has proved not to be a stable store of value, which is a requisite for a stable reserve currency."

But of course it has not been stable!

It is the very same globalists that are pushing for this new world currency that have been behind the destruction of not only the U.S. dollar but all paper currencies around the world.

In fact, there are many who are speculating that the recession that the world economy is now being "pushed" into is actually a contrived crisis which is designed to pave the way for the grand solution that the globalists have wanted all along.

So exactly what is that grand solution?

During a speech back in May, IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn called for the introduction of a global currency backed by a global central bank which would act as the "lender of last resort" in the event of a severe economic crisis.

That is what the globalists have always wanted – a global currency and a global central bank that we all pay taxes to.

Right now the world is not likely to go for it, but if the upcoming recession (or depression) is deep enough, then the would might just be willing to accept a global currency and a global central bank.

You see, it is the exact same problem/reaction/solution paradigm that the globalists have used time after time after time to get their way.

Even now, globalist organizations are lining up their proposals for global taxes that they wish to impose on all of us as we recently described on one of our sister sites….

*The World Health Organization recently announced that it is ready to impose global taxes on all of us. The World Health Organization says that it needs a lot more money and that it has some creative ideas for how to get it. Two of their main ideas for "raising revenue" are a global tax on Internet use and a global tax on paying bills online. These taxes would go directly to the World Health Organization.

*The IMF is actually calling for two new global taxes. One would be an international deposit insurance tax, and the other would be a tax on the profits of financial institutions worldwide. The IMF says that the funds would be used by them to prevent another major financial crisis.

So are you ready for a world currency and a world central bank that you will pay your world taxes to?

Malaysian economist Jomo Kwame Sundaram, the U.N. assistant secretary general for economic development, admitted during a news conference that "there's going to be resistance" to the idea of a world currency.

You think?

Oh, did they expect that we were just going to hand over our national sovereignty to them without any resistance whatsoever?

It is bad enough to have the Federal Reserve (a privately-owned central bank controlled by international bankers) controlling our currency right now.

If we ever allow the globalists to institute a global currency, a global central bank and global taxes then you can kiss our freedom and our national sovereignty goodbye.

But do you see any coverage of this on any of the big news channels?

Of course not.

The vast majority of the American people have no idea this is going on.

They are too busy catching up on the latest celebrity gossip and lining up to watch the new "Twilight" movie.

Our founding fathers are not here to stand up for our liberty and freedom, so it is up to you and I.

We must get the word out about the plan for a global currency and a global central bank before it is too late.

So, what would you do when the UN starts dictating our freedoms?

On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States. The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms.

The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened. Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.

This is not a joke nor a false warning. As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control.

Read the Article

U..S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.

The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush’s administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015

]]> http://www.getoutoftheun.org/2010/04/obama-finds-way-to-ignore-2nd-amendment/feed/ 0 http://www.getoutoftheun.org/2010/04/turn-your-handguns-in-to-the-un/ http://www.getoutoftheun.org/2010/04/turn-your-handguns-in-to-the-un/#comments Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:49:12 +0000 admin http://www.getoutoftheun.org/?p=36

Well your current USSA government, and the UN are ready for you to. They have a vision of a world government spreading the wealth across the world and for the world government to determine our rights and entitlements. You might find the video below interesting.

If you found the above part 1 of 5 video interesting, I encourage you to watch the other 4 on You Tube.

A day after his White House meeting with President Barack Obama, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called the United States a "deadbeat" donor to the world body.

From the Fox News Site: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/11/chief-calls-deadbeat-donor/

A day after his White House meeting with President Barack Obama, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called the United States a "deadbeat" donor to the world body while making the made the rounds on Capitol Hill.

Ban's criticism Wednesday of the U.N.'s single biggest backer irked some members of the House Foreign Relations Committee. They were generally supportive of his leadership but voiced concern about U.N. efforts in areas from Sudan to Somalia.

"He used the word 'deadbeat' when it came to characterizing the United States. I take great umbrage (over) that," Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, the panel's senior Republican, said after an hour-long, closed-door meeting. "We certainly contribute a whole lot of U.S. taxpayer dollars to that organization. We do not deserve such a phrase.

Interviewed after the session, Ban said he had wanted to draw attention to the fact that the U.S. agrees to pay 22 percent of the U.N.'s $4.86 billion operating budget, but is perennially late with its dues — and now is about $1 billion behind on its payments.

That figure is "soon to be $1.6 billion," Ban emphasized. Asked if he'd used the word 'deadbeat' during the meeting, he replied, "Yes, I did — I did," then laughed mischievously.

Ban also urged Congress to adopt climate change legislation to boost chances for his top goal this year: clinching a global climate deal. The hope is for accord at a U.N.-sponsored conference in Copenhagen in December.

"I believe for the United States it's a necessity. It will have a very politically important impact on the ongoing negotiation," he said. "We need the U.S. leadership at this time. Whole world is looking at U.S. leadership."

Ban generally got a "very respectful" reception from the House committee, said Rep. Bill Delahunt, D-Mass., who chairs a subcommittee that oversees U.S. participation in the United Nations.

"Clearly they have an interest in the United States meeting its responsibility. In terms of peacekeeping, we're about $670 million behind, and I think the argument is well-stated," Delahunt said.

He noted America backs U.N. peacekeeping operations — and said it loses credibility if it doesn't provide financial support. "And at the same time, we have to recognize that there are no American troops involved in the 17 different venues where there are peacekeeping operations," Delahunt said.

Ban was also meeting with Sen. John Kerry, D-Calif., the Senate Foreign Relations chairman, and other committee members.

During an Oval Office session Tuesday, Obama pledged to work to help bring peace to Darfur and called it "not acceptable" that Sudan's president has been kicking out humanitarian aid workers from the region of western Sudan. President Omar al-Bashir was charged in an International Criminal Court arrest warrant with war crimes and crimes against humanity for targeting civilians.

Ban told Obama his support for climate legislation is "encouraging", but said 2009 is a "make-or-break" year for the U.N. and its member countries on global warming, Darfur and other prominent conflicts.

"It's the beginning of the establishment of a close relationship between the two," said Peter Yeo, a vice president for the U.N. Foundation, launched by media mogul Ted Turner's $1 billion donation in 1997.

Yeo, a former House Democratic staffer and foreign policy adviser to both the Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton campaigns last year, said Obama's budget proposal also is a hopeful sign for the U.S.-U.N. relationship.

Obama seeks a 9.5 percent increase in international affairs spending, which Yeo said would be enough to cover not only next year's U.S. dues to the U.N., but also $1 billion in arrears.

Here’s a hint — think of the UN’s goal of a Global One Government Communist World that the UN governs. We need to get out of the UN, and get these asshole out of the US.

Wed 17 Dec 2008, 15:33 GMT

By Robert Evans

GENEVA, Dec 17 (Reuters) – The United Nations should stop passing resolutions, largely promoted by Islamic countries, calling for laws against “defamation of religion”, according to international experts on freedom of expression.

The four experts — from Africa, Europe, Latin America and the United Nations itself — said such laws were often used to shield religious leaders from criticism and to suppress religious minorities and non-believers.

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) – The U.N. General Assembly split over the issue of gay rights on Thursday after a European-drafted statement calling for decriminalization of homosexuality prompted an Arab-backed one opposing it.

Diplomats said a joint statement initiated by France and the Netherlands gathered 66 signatures in the 192-nation assembly after it was read out by Argentina at a plenary session. A rival statement, read out by Syria, gathered some 60.

The two statements remained open for further signatures, the diplomats said. No resolution was drafted on the issue and there was no voting, they added.

The division in the General Assembly reflected conflicting laws in the world at large. According to sponsors of the Franco-Dutch text, homosexuality is illegal in 77 countries, seven of which punish it by death.

The European Union-backed document, noting that the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was marked this month, said those rights applied equally to all people, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.

It urged states “to take all the necessary measures, in particular legislative or administrative, to ensure that sexual orientation or gender identity may under no circumstances be the basis for criminal penalties, in particular executions, arrests or detention.”

But the opposing document said the statement “delves into matters which fall essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of states” and could lead to “the social normalization, and possibly the legitimization, of many deplorable acts including pedophilia.”

“We note with concern the attempts to create ‘new rights’ or ‘new standards,’ by misinterpreting the Universal Declaration and international treaties to include such notions that were never articulated nor agreed by the general membership,” it added.

This, it said, could “seriously jeopardize the entire international human rights framework.”

Muslim countries have for years opposed international attempts to legalize homosexuality.

U.S. officials said the United States had not signed either document. They said the broad framing of the language in the statement supporting decriminalization created conflicts with U.S. law, but gave no further details.

But Dutch Foreign Minister Maxime Verhagen told reporters it was a “very special day at the U.N.”

“For the first time in history a large group of member states speaks out in the General Assembly against discrimination based on sexual orientation,” he said. “With today’s statement, this is no longer a taboo within the U.N.”

Syrian Ambassador Bashar Ja’afari told reporters sponsors of the statement had “cornered” other members by springing the declaration on them.

Link

UNICEF works with terror-linked Islamics on children’s rights

The United Nations Children’s Fund has announced an agreement with an organization linked by the U.S. government to al-Qaida and the Taliban to work to improve services to children in Saudi Arabia.

Link

No — this has nothing to do about Credit Cards — but with UN employees using the United Nations Letterhead to obtain Visas to enter the United States fr anyone willing to pay.

Link

I’m sure most people have by now heard of the raping of women and children by United Nation Forces in Africa. Instead of detailing it here, the below links are references to where you can read the details from those who’s researched the allegations.

• U.N. ‘peacekeepers’ rape women, children

• Michelle Malkin » THE U.N.’S RAPE OF THE INNOCENTS

• U.N. Faces More Accusations of Sexual Misconduct (washingtonpost.com)

• U.S. Measure Against Rape Fails at U.N. – New York Times